There is no sexuality as such. Rather, there are diverse forms of sexuality and desire, which historically came about under conditions of power and domination. They are fueled by, but they also uphold power relations. Accordingly one may ask: How is sexuality involved in fostering racist hierarchies? How far does racism influence the distribution of social recognition or devaluation with reference to specific ways of sexual life? Which other constructions of social differences intertwine with racialized sexuality or sexualized racism?
The idea is to estimate sexuality from a perspective that assumes the interdependency of various social inequalities and discriminations. This might disclose how racist hierarchies are reinforced or undermined by class differences or norms of able-bodiedness. It might show how social hierarchies are built with the help of discourses and images of sexuality: taboos or rules of miscegenation, stereotypes of viciousness, attributions of animality, or moral ideals that define inferiority or superiority. Bodies are devalued, subjecthood is denied, and the status of being human is questioned – thanks to ascribing hypersexuality or to desexualizing certain bodies.
Which strategies of queer cultural and queer of colour politics work against racializations of sexuality or sexualized racism? How does activism tackle the complex interplay of heteronormativity, normative able-bodiedness, rigid gender binaries or capitalist economy?
RECENT EVENTS
for a full list of events, please scan the chronological archive